Koel vs Cinemataztic Note Webtrees-no

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureKoelCinemataztic Note Webtrees-no
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseMITMIT
LanguagePHPGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metalbare-metal, binary, source
GitHub stars★ 17,208★ 745
First released20162012
ReplacesSpotifyUniversal Media Server

Why pick each one

Choose Koel if…

  • Beautiful interface
  • Active community
Koel details

Choose Cinemataztic Note Webtrees-no if…

  • Extremely simple
  • Tiny resource use
Cinemataztic Note Webtrees-no details

Frequently asked questions

Is Koel or Cinemataztic Note Webtrees-no better?

Neither is universally better. Koel has the larger community, while Cinemataztic Note Webtrees-no is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Koel and Cinemataztic Note Webtrees-no free and open-source?

Yes. Koel is licensed under MIT and Cinemataztic Note Webtrees-no under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Koel and Cinemataztic Note Webtrees-no with Docker?

Koel: yes. Cinemataztic Note Webtrees-no: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons