Kodi vs VideoLAN Client (VLC)

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureKodiVideoLAN Client (VLC)
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseGPL-2.0GPL-2.0
LanguageC++C
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentbinary, bare-metalbare-metal
GitHub stars★ 21,064
First released20022020
ReplacesPlex

Why pick each one

Choose Kodi if…

  • Extremely flexible
  • Massive add-on library
  • Long-standing project
Kodi details

Choose VideoLAN Client (VLC) if…

  • Released under the GPL-2.0 license
  • Written in C
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
VideoLAN Client (VLC) details

Frequently asked questions

Is Kodi or VideoLAN Client (VLC) better?

Neither is universally better. Kodi has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Kodi and VideoLAN Client (VLC) free and open-source?

Yes. Kodi is licensed under GPL-2.0 and VideoLAN Client (VLC) under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Kodi and VideoLAN Client (VLC) with Docker?

Kodi: check the project docs for container support. VideoLAN Client (VLC): check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons