Stream Master vs SRS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureStream MasterSRS
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageC#C++
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, sourcedocker
GitHub stars★ 189★ 29,105
First released20232025
ReplacesxTeVe, Threadfin

Why pick each one

Choose Stream Master if…

  • Powerful channel management
  • Active development
Stream Master details

Choose SRS if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 29.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
SRS details

Frequently asked questions

Is Stream Master or SRS better?

Neither is universally better. SRS has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Stream Master and SRS free and open-source?

Yes. Stream Master is licensed under MIT and SRS under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Stream Master and SRS with Docker?

Stream Master: yes. SRS: yes.

Related comparisons