SHSelfHostIndex

KoboToolbox vs Luckysheet

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted office suites options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
KO KoboToolbox Field data collection for surveys and research VS LU Luckysheet Online spreadsheet component with rich features
FeatureKoboToolboxLuckysheet
CategoryOffice SuitesOffice Suites
LicenseAGPL-3.0MIT
LanguagePythonJavaScript
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM4,096 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, sourcesource, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 178★ 16,650
First released20142019
ReplacesSurveyMonkey, QualtricsGoogle Sheets, Microsoft Excel

Why pick each one

Choose KoboToolbox if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Python
KoboToolbox details

Choose Luckysheet if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Mature project with 16.6k GitHub stars
  • Written in JavaScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Luckysheet details

Frequently asked questions

Is KoboToolbox or Luckysheet better?

Luckysheet is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider KoboToolbox if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are KoboToolbox and Luckysheet free and open-source?

Yes. KoboToolbox is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Luckysheet under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run KoboToolbox and Luckysheet with Docker?

KoboToolbox: yes. Luckysheet: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons