Kestra vs Maxun
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted automation & workflows options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Kestra
Declarative orchestration and scheduling platform
VS
Maxun
No-code web data extraction and scraping platform
| Feature | Kestra | Maxun |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation & Workflows | Automation & Workflows |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Java | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 27,575 | ★ 17,077 |
| First released | 2021 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Zapier, Make | Octoparse, Import.io |
Why pick each one
Choose Kestra if…
- Strong for data orchestration
- Scalable architecture
- Open-source license
Choose Maxun if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 17.1k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Kestra or Maxun better?
Neither is universally better. Kestra has the larger community, while Maxun is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Kestra and Maxun free and open-source?
Yes. Kestra is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Maxun under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Kestra and Maxun with Docker?
Kestra: yes. Maxun: yes.