KeeWeb vs Browserpass
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted password managers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
KeeWeb
Web-based client for KeePass databases
VS
Browserpass
Browser extension front-end for the pass manager
| Feature | KeeWeb | Browserpass |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Password Managers | Password Managers |
| License | MIT | ISC |
| Language | HTML | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 12,977 | ★ 1,009 |
| First released | 2015 | 2016 |
| Replaces | LastPass, 1Password | LastPass extension, 1Password extension |
Why pick each one
Choose Browserpass if…
- Released under the ISC license
- Active community (1k GitHub stars)
- Written in JavaScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is KeeWeb or Browserpass better?
KeeWeb is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Browserpass if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are KeeWeb and Browserpass free and open-source?
Yes. KeeWeb is licensed under MIT and Browserpass under ISC. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run KeeWeb and Browserpass with Docker?
KeeWeb: yes. Browserpass: check the project docs for container support.