KeePassium vs Browserpass
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted password managers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
KeePassium
KeePass-compatible password manager for iOS and macOS
VS
Browserpass
Browser extension front-end for the pass manager
| Feature | KeePassium | Browserpass |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Password Managers | Password Managers |
| License | GPL-3.0 | ISC |
| Language | Swift | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | binary | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,663 | ★ 1,009 |
| First released | 2019 | 2016 |
| Replaces | 1Password, LastPass | LastPass extension, 1Password extension |
Why pick each one
Choose Browserpass if…
- Released under the ISC license
- Active community (1k GitHub stars)
- Written in JavaScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is KeePassium or Browserpass better?
KeePassium is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Browserpass if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are KeePassium and Browserpass free and open-source?
Yes. KeePassium is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Browserpass under ISC. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run KeePassium and Browserpass with Docker?
KeePassium: check the project docs for container support. Browserpass: check the project docs for container support.