SHSelfHostIndex

KeePassDX vs Bitwarden Directory Connector

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted password managers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
KE KeePassDX Material design KeePass client for Android VS BI Bitwarden Directory Connector Sync directory users into a self-hosted vault
FeatureKeePassDXBitwarden Directory Connector
CategoryPassword ManagersPassword Managers
LicenseGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguageKotlinTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB256 MB
Deploymentbinarybinary, source
GitHub stars★ 7,098★ 314
First released20172018
Replaces1Password, LastPassOkta provisioning, JumpCloud

Why pick each one

Choose KeePassDX if…

  • Clean modern mobile UI
  • Fully offline
KeePassDX details

Choose Bitwarden Directory Connector if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Written in TypeScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Bitwarden Directory Connector details

Frequently asked questions

Is KeePassDX or Bitwarden Directory Connector better?

KeePassDX is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Bitwarden Directory Connector if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are KeePassDX and Bitwarden Directory Connector free and open-source?

Yes. KeePassDX is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Bitwarden Directory Connector under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run KeePassDX and Bitwarden Directory Connector with Docker?

KeePassDX: check the project docs for container support. Bitwarden Directory Connector: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons