Apache Allura vs RhodeCode
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Apache Allura
Open-source forge for managing source code and projects
VS
RhodeCode
Unified source code management for Git, SVN and Mercurial
| Feature | Apache Allura | RhodeCode |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Git Hosting & Forges | Developer Tools & Git |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Python | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 148 | ★ 800 |
| First released | 2012 | 2010 |
| Replaces | GitHub, SourceForge | GitHub, Bitbucket |
Why pick each one
Choose Apache Allura if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
Choose RhodeCode if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is Apache Allura or RhodeCode better?
Neither is universally better. RhodeCode has the larger community; both share a hard setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Apache Allura and RhodeCode free and open-source?
Yes. Apache Allura is licensed under Apache-2.0 and RhodeCode under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Apache Allura and RhodeCode with Docker?
Apache Allura: yes. RhodeCode: yes.