Apache Allura vs klaus
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Apache Allura
Open-source forge for managing source code and projects
VS
klaus
Simple, easy-to-set-up Git web viewer
| Feature | Apache Allura | klaus |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Git Hosting & Forges | Developer Tools & Git |
| License | Apache-2.0 | ISC |
| Language | Python | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 148 | ★ 702 |
| First released | 2012 | 2011 |
| Replaces | GitHub, SourceForge | GitHub |
Why pick each one
Choose Apache Allura if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
Choose klaus if…
- Released under the ISC license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is Apache Allura or klaus better?
klaus is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Apache Allura if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Apache Allura and klaus free and open-source?
Yes. Apache Allura is licensed under Apache-2.0 and klaus under ISC. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Apache Allura and klaus with Docker?
Apache Allura: yes. klaus: yes.