Seerr vs Transmission

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSeerrTransmission
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseMITGPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptC++
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM50 MB50 MB
Deploymentbare-metalbare-metal
GitHub stars★ 12,177★ 15,047
First released20232023
ReplacesOverseerrµTorrent

Why pick each one

Choose Seerr if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 12.2k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Seerr details

Choose Transmission if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 15k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Transmission details

Frequently asked questions

Is Seerr or Transmission better?

Neither is universally better. Transmission has the larger community, while Seerr is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Seerr and Transmission free and open-source?

Yes. Seerr is licensed under MIT and Transmission under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Seerr and Transmission with Docker?

Seerr: check the project docs for container support. Transmission: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons