Jellyfin vs VideoLAN Client (VLC)

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureJellyfinVideoLAN Client (VLC)
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseGPL-2.0GPL-2.0
LanguageC#C
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, binarybare-metal
GitHub stars★ 55,528
First released20182020
ReplacesPlex, Emby

Why pick each one

Choose Jellyfin if…

  • No subscription or account needed
  • Active community development
  • Wide client support
Jellyfin details

Choose VideoLAN Client (VLC) if…

  • Released under the GPL-2.0 license
  • Written in C
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
VideoLAN Client (VLC) details

Frequently asked questions

Is Jellyfin or VideoLAN Client (VLC) better?

Jellyfin is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider VideoLAN Client (VLC) if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Jellyfin and VideoLAN Client (VLC) free and open-source?

Yes. Jellyfin is licensed under GPL-2.0 and VideoLAN Client (VLC) under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Jellyfin and VideoLAN Client (VLC) with Docker?

Jellyfin: yes. VideoLAN Client (VLC): check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons