Jellyfin vs Tube

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureJellyfinTube
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseGPL-2.0MIT
LanguageC#
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM512 MB50 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, binarybare-metal
GitHub stars★ 55,528
First released20182023
ReplacesPlex, EmbyDailymotion, Vimeo, YouTube

Why pick each one

Choose Jellyfin if…

  • No subscription or account needed
  • Active community development
  • Wide client support
Jellyfin details

Choose Tube if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Tube details

Frequently asked questions

Is Jellyfin or Tube better?

Neither is universally better. Jellyfin has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Jellyfin and Tube free and open-source?

Yes. Jellyfin is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Tube under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Jellyfin and Tube with Docker?

Jellyfin: yes. Tube: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons