Jellyfin vs Supysonic

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureJellyfinSupysonic
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseGPL-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageC#Python
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM512 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, binarydocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 55,528★ 289
First released20182013
ReplacesPlex, EmbySpotify

Why pick each one

Choose Jellyfin if…

  • No subscription or account needed
  • Active community development
  • Wide client support
Jellyfin details

Choose Supysonic if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Python
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Supysonic details

Frequently asked questions

Is Jellyfin or Supysonic better?

Jellyfin is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Supysonic if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Jellyfin and Supysonic free and open-source?

Yes. Jellyfin is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Supysonic under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Jellyfin and Supysonic with Docker?

Jellyfin: yes. Supysonic: yes.

Related comparisons