Jaeger vs Uptime Kuma

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureJaegerUptime Kuma
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageGoJavaScript
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, helmdocker
GitHub stars★ 23,082★ 89,960
First released20172021
ReplacesDatadog APM, New RelicPingdom, UptimeRobot

Why pick each one

Choose Jaeger if…

  • CNCF graduated project
  • Mature and widely adopted
Jaeger details

Choose Uptime Kuma if…

  • Very easy to use
  • Great notifications
  • Lightweight
Uptime Kuma details

Frequently asked questions

Is Jaeger or Uptime Kuma better?

Uptime Kuma is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Jaeger if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Jaeger and Uptime Kuma free and open-source?

Yes. Jaeger is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Uptime Kuma under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Jaeger and Uptime Kuma with Docker?

Jaeger: yes. Uptime Kuma: yes.

Related comparisons