Jaeger vs Upptime
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Jaeger
End-to-end distributed tracing for microservices
VS
Upptime
GitHub-powered uptime monitor and status page
| Feature | Jaeger | Upptime |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Go | Markdown |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, helm | one-click, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 23,082 | ★ 17,114 |
| First released | 2017 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Datadog APM, New Relic | Statuspage, Pingdom |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Jaeger or Upptime better?
Neither is universally better. Jaeger has the larger community, while Upptime is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Jaeger and Upptime free and open-source?
Yes. Jaeger is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Upptime under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Jaeger and Upptime with Docker?
Jaeger: yes. Upptime: check the project docs for container support.