Jackett vs Tube Archivist

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureJackettTube Archivist
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseGPL-2.0GPL-3.0
LanguageC#Python
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM200 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 15,854★ 8,342
First released20232021
ReplacesYouTube

Why pick each one

Choose Jackett if…

  • Released under the GPL-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 15.9k GitHub stars
  • Written in C#
Jackett details

Choose Tube Archivist if…

  • Great for archiving channels
  • Powerful search
Tube Archivist details

Frequently asked questions

Is Jackett or Tube Archivist better?

Jackett is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Tube Archivist if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Jackett and Tube Archivist free and open-source?

Yes. Jackett is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Tube Archivist under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Jackett and Tube Archivist with Docker?

Jackett: check the project docs for container support. Tube Archivist: yes.

Related comparisons