Jackett vs Supysonic

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureJackettSupysonic
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseGPL-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageC#Python
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM200 MB128 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 15,854★ 289
First released20232013
ReplacesSpotify

Why pick each one

Choose Jackett if…

  • Released under the GPL-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 15.9k GitHub stars
  • Written in C#
Jackett details

Choose Supysonic if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Python
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Supysonic details

Frequently asked questions

Is Jackett or Supysonic better?

Jackett is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Supysonic if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Jackett and Supysonic free and open-source?

Yes. Jackett is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Supysonic under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Jackett and Supysonic with Docker?

Jackett: check the project docs for container support. Supysonic: yes.

Related comparisons