Ipsilon vs Logto
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted identity & sso options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Ipsilon
Identity provider for federated single sign-on
VS
Logto
Developer-friendly authentication and authorization platform
| Feature | Ipsilon | Logto |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Identity & SSO | Identity & SSO |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MPL-2.0 |
| Language | Python | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | docker, kubernetes, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 80 | ★ 14,305 |
| First released | 2014 | 2022 |
| Replaces | Okta, PingFederate | Auth0, Firebase Auth, Clerk |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Ipsilon or Logto better?
Logto is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Ipsilon if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Ipsilon and Logto free and open-source?
Yes. Ipsilon is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Logto under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Ipsilon and Logto with Docker?
Ipsilon: check the project docs for container support. Logto: yes.