Kubo (IPFS) vs LocalSend

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureKubo (IPFS)LocalSend
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageGoDart
Setup difficultyHardEasy
Min. RAM512 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, binary, snapbinary
GitHub stars★ 17,093★ 87,025
First released20152022
ReplacesDropboxAirDrop

Why pick each one

Choose Kubo (IPFS) if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 17.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
Kubo (IPFS) details

Choose LocalSend if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 87k GitHub stars
  • Written in Dart
LocalSend details

Frequently asked questions

Is Kubo (IPFS) or LocalSend better?

LocalSend is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Kubo (IPFS) if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Kubo (IPFS) and LocalSend free and open-source?

Yes. Kubo (IPFS) is licensed under MIT and LocalSend under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Kubo (IPFS) and LocalSend with Docker?

Kubo (IPFS): yes. LocalSend: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons