InvoicePlane vs Fat Free CRM
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted crm & business apps options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
InvoicePlane
Self-hosted invoicing and quote management application
VS
Fat Free CRM
Ruby on Rails open-source customer relationship manager
| Feature | InvoicePlane | Fat Free CRM |
|---|---|---|
| Category | CRM & Business Apps | CRM & Business Apps |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | PHP | Ruby |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,104 | ★ 3,628 |
| First released | 2014 | 2008 |
| Replaces | FreshBooks, QuickBooks | Salesforce |
Why pick each one
Choose Fat Free CRM if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.6k GitHub stars)
- Written in Ruby
Frequently asked questions
Is InvoicePlane or Fat Free CRM better?
Neither is universally better. Fat Free CRM has the larger community, while InvoicePlane is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are InvoicePlane and Fat Free CRM free and open-source?
Yes. InvoicePlane is licensed under MIT and Fat Free CRM under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run InvoicePlane and Fat Free CRM with Docker?
InvoicePlane: yes. Fat Free CRM: yes.