Invidious vs Snikket

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted social networks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureInvidiousSnikket
CategorySocial NetworksSocial Networks
LicenseGPL-3.0-onlyAGPL-3.0
LanguageCrystalLua
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM50 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker, source
GitHub stars★ 22,442★ 437
First released20232020
ReplacesYouTubeWhatsApp, Signal

Why pick each one

Choose Invidious if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0-only license
  • Mature project with 22.4k GitHub stars
  • Written in Crystal
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Invidious details

Choose Snikket if…

  • Very easy to deploy
  • Polished mobile apps
Snikket details

Frequently asked questions

Is Invidious or Snikket better?

Neither is universally better. Invidious has the larger community, while Snikket is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Invidious and Snikket free and open-source?

Yes. Invidious is licensed under GPL-3.0-only and Snikket under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Invidious and Snikket with Docker?

Invidious: check the project docs for container support. Snikket: yes.

Related comparisons