Invidious vs Pleroma

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted social networks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureInvidiousPleroma
CategorySocial NetworksSocial Networks
LicenseGPL-3.0-onlyAGPL-3.0
LanguageCrystalElixir
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM50 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 22,442★ 2,200
First released20232017
ReplacesYouTubeTwitter, Tumblr

Why pick each one

Choose Invidious if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0-only license
  • Mature project with 22.4k GitHub stars
  • Written in Crystal
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Invidious details

Choose Pleroma if…

  • Runs on small servers
  • Compatible with Mastodon apps
Pleroma details

Frequently asked questions

Is Invidious or Pleroma better?

Neither is universally better. Invidious has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Invidious and Pleroma free and open-source?

Yes. Invidious is licensed under GPL-3.0-only and Pleroma under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Invidious and Pleroma with Docker?

Invidious: check the project docs for container support. Pleroma: yes.

Related comparisons