Infrared vs OpenRCT2

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted game servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureInfraredOpenRCT2
CategoryGame ServersGame Servers
LicenseMITGPL-3.0
LanguageGoC++
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binary, sourcebare-metal, binary, source
GitHub stars★ 855★ 16,049
First released20202014
ReplacesManual server managementRollerCoaster Tycoon

Why pick each one

Choose Infrared if…

  • Saves resources on idle servers
  • Flexible routing
Infrared details

Choose OpenRCT2 if…

  • Faithful modern remake
  • Active community
OpenRCT2 details

Frequently asked questions

Is Infrared or OpenRCT2 better?

Neither is universally better. OpenRCT2 has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Infrared and OpenRCT2 free and open-source?

Yes. Infrared is licensed under MIT and OpenRCT2 under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Infrared and OpenRCT2 with Docker?

Infrared: yes. OpenRCT2: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons