imaginary vs SRS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureimaginarySRS
CategoryPhoto ManagementMedia Servers
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageGoC++
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binary, sourcedocker
GitHub stars★ 6,076★ 29,105
First released20152025
ReplacesCloudinary, imgix

Why pick each one

Choose imaginary if…

  • Very fast processing
  • Easy to scale
imaginary details

Choose SRS if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 29.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
SRS details

Frequently asked questions

Is imaginary or SRS better?

Neither is universally better. SRS has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are imaginary and SRS free and open-source?

Yes. imaginary is licensed under MIT and SRS under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run imaginary and SRS with Docker?

imaginary: yes. SRS: yes.

Related comparisons