imaginary vs LocalSend

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureimaginaryLocalSend
CategoryPhoto ManagementFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageGoDart
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM256 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, binary, sourcebinary
GitHub stars★ 6,076★ 87,025
First released20152022
ReplacesCloudinary, imgixAirDrop

Why pick each one

Choose imaginary if…

  • Very fast processing
  • Easy to scale
imaginary details

Choose LocalSend if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 87k GitHub stars
  • Written in Dart
LocalSend details

Frequently asked questions

Is imaginary or LocalSend better?

LocalSend is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider imaginary if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are imaginary and LocalSend free and open-source?

Yes. imaginary is licensed under MIT and LocalSend under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run imaginary and LocalSend with Docker?

imaginary: yes. LocalSend: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons