Icecast vs SRS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureIcecastSRS
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseGPL-2.0MIT
LanguageCC++
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 600★ 29,105
First released19992025
ReplacesSpotify

Why pick each one

Choose Icecast if…

  • Battle-tested and stable
  • Low resource use
Icecast details

Choose SRS if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 29.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
SRS details

Frequently asked questions

Is Icecast or SRS better?

Neither is universally better. SRS has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Icecast and SRS free and open-source?

Yes. Icecast is licensed under GPL-2.0 and SRS under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Icecast and SRS with Docker?

Icecast: yes. SRS: yes.

Related comparisons