Hoppscotch vs Smocker

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted developer tools & git options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureHoppscotchSmocker
CategoryDeveloper Tools & GitDeveloper Tools & Git
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageTypeScriptTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM512 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetesdocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 79,994★ 1,284
First released20192019
ReplacesPostman, InsomniaWireMock, Mockoon

Why pick each one

Choose Hoppscotch if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
Hoppscotch details

Choose Smocker if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.3k GitHub stars)
Smocker details

Frequently asked questions

Is Hoppscotch or Smocker better?

Neither is universally better. Hoppscotch has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Hoppscotch and Smocker free and open-source?

Yes. Hoppscotch is licensed under MIT and Smocker under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Hoppscotch and Smocker with Docker?

Hoppscotch: yes. Smocker: yes.

Related comparisons