Ring-MQTT vs ntfy
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted home automation options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Ring-MQTT
Local MQTT bridge for Ring cameras and alarms
VS
ntfy
Send push notifications to your phone via simple HTTP
| Feature | Ring-MQTT | ntfy |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Home Automation | Home Automation |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 779 | ★ 33,263 |
| First released | 2019 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Ring app | Pushover, Pushbullet |
Why pick each one
Choose Ring-MQTT if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in JavaScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Ring-MQTT or ntfy better?
ntfy is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Ring-MQTT if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Ring-MQTT and ntfy free and open-source?
Yes. Ring-MQTT is licensed under MIT and ntfy under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Ring-MQTT and ntfy with Docker?
Ring-MQTT: yes. ntfy: yes.