Hiccup vs Portainer CE
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted dashboards & startpages options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Hiccup
Beautiful static homepage to get to your links and services quickly
VS
Portainer CE
Lightweight management UI for Docker and Kubernetes
| Feature | Hiccup | Portainer CE |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Dashboards & Startpages | Dashboards & Startpages |
| License | MIT | Zlib |
| Language | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, kubernetes, helm |
| GitHub stars | ★ 196 | ★ 38,184 |
| First released | 2024 | 2016 |
| Replaces | — | Rancher, Docker Desktop |
Why pick each one
Choose Hiccup if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in TypeScript
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Hiccup or Portainer CE better?
Portainer CE is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Hiccup if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Hiccup and Portainer CE free and open-source?
Yes. Hiccup is licensed under MIT and Portainer CE under Zlib. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Hiccup and Portainer CE with Docker?
Hiccup: yes. Portainer CE: yes.