Heimdall vs Grafana Loki

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureHeimdallGrafana Loki
CategoryDashboards & StartpagesMonitoring & Status
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguagePHPGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, kubernetes, helm
GitHub stars★ 9,291★ 28,687
First released20172018
ReplacesHeimdallSplunk, Datadog Logs

Why pick each one

Choose Heimdall if…

  • Very simple to set up
  • Clean look
  • Low maintenance
Heimdall details

Choose Grafana Loki if…

  • Cheap to run compared to full-text indexers
  • Familiar Prometheus-style labels
Grafana Loki details

Frequently asked questions

Is Heimdall or Grafana Loki better?

Neither is universally better. Grafana Loki has the larger community, while Heimdall is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Heimdall and Grafana Loki free and open-source?

Yes. Heimdall is licensed under MIT and Grafana Loki under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Heimdall and Grafana Loki with Docker?

Heimdall: yes. Grafana Loki: yes.

Related comparisons