Headscale vs wayvnc
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Headscale
Open-source self-hosted Tailscale control server
VS
wayvnc
VNC server for wlroots-based Wayland compositors
| Feature | Headscale | wayvnc |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Remote Access & VPN | Remote Access & VPN |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | ISC |
| Language | Go | C |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 42,612 | ★ 1,787 |
| First released | 2020 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Tailscale | TightVNC, RealVNC |
Why pick each one
Choose wayvnc if…
- Released under the ISC license
- Active community (1.8k GitHub stars)
- Written in C
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Headscale or wayvnc better?
Neither is universally better. Headscale has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Headscale and wayvnc free and open-source?
Yes. Headscale is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and wayvnc under ISC. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Headscale and wayvnc with Docker?
Headscale: yes. wayvnc: check the project docs for container support.