Headscale vs localtunnel

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureHeadscalelocaltunnel
CategoryRemote Access & VPNRemote Access & VPN
LicenseBSD-3-ClauseMIT
LanguageGoJavaScript
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM128 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 42,612★ 22,440
First released20202015
ReplacesTailscalengrok

Why pick each one

Choose Headscale if…

  • Full control of coordination
  • Lightweight
Headscale details

Choose localtunnel if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 22.4k GitHub stars
localtunnel details

Frequently asked questions

Is Headscale or localtunnel better?

Neither is universally better. Headscale has the larger community, while localtunnel is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Headscale and localtunnel free and open-source?

Yes. Headscale is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and localtunnel under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Headscale and localtunnel with Docker?

Headscale: yes. localtunnel: yes.

Related comparisons