Headphones vs SRS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureHeadphonesSRS
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseGPL-3.0-or-laterMIT
LanguagePythonC++
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM50 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 3,751★ 29,105
First released20232025
Replaces

Why pick each one

Choose Headphones if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0-or-later license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (3.8k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Python
Headphones details

Choose SRS if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 29.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
SRS details

Frequently asked questions

Is Headphones or SRS better?

Neither is universally better. SRS has the larger community, while Headphones is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Headphones and SRS free and open-source?

Yes. Headphones is licensed under GPL-3.0-or-later and SRS under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Headphones and SRS with Docker?

Headphones: check the project docs for container support. SRS: yes.

Related comparisons