Headlamp vs lazydocker

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted developer tools & git options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureHeadlamplazydocker
CategoryDeveloper Tools & GitDeveloper Tools & Git
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageTypeScriptGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM256 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, helm, binarybinary, source
GitHub stars★ 7,027★ 52,348
First released20212019
ReplacesLens, Kubernetes DashboardDocker Desktop

Why pick each one

Choose Headlamp if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 7k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Headlamp details

Choose lazydocker if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 52.3k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
lazydocker details

Frequently asked questions

Is Headlamp or lazydocker better?

lazydocker is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Headlamp if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Headlamp and lazydocker free and open-source?

Yes. Headlamp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and lazydocker under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Headlamp and lazydocker with Docker?

Headlamp: yes. lazydocker: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons