Haunt vs Jekyll
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted blogging platforms options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Haunt
Programmable static site and blog generator in Scheme
VS
Jekyll
Simple, blog-aware static site generator
| Feature | Haunt | Jekyll |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Blogging Platforms | Blogging Platforms |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Scheme | Ruby |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | source, binary | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 400 | ★ 51,622 |
| First released | 2015 | 2008 |
| Replaces | Jekyll | WordPress, Blogger |
Why pick each one
Choose Haunt if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Written in Scheme
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Haunt or Jekyll better?
Neither is universally better. Jekyll has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Haunt and Jekyll free and open-source?
Yes. Haunt is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Jekyll under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Haunt and Jekyll with Docker?
Haunt: check the project docs for container support. Jekyll: check the project docs for container support.