hash-calendar vs Nextcloud

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featurehash-calendarNextcloud
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguageJavaScriptPHP
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker, bare-metal, snap
GitHub stars★ 69★ 36,362
First released20262016
ReplacesGoogle Agenda, Microsoft OutlookDropbox, Google Drive, Microsoft 365

Why pick each one

Choose hash-calendar if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Written in JavaScript
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
hash-calendar details

Choose Nextcloud if…

  • Feature-rich and extensible
  • Active development and large community
  • Integrates calendar, contacts and office
Nextcloud details

Frequently asked questions

Is hash-calendar or Nextcloud better?

Neither is universally better. Nextcloud has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are hash-calendar and Nextcloud free and open-source?

Yes. hash-calendar is licensed under MIT and Nextcloud under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run hash-calendar and Nextcloud with Docker?

hash-calendar: check the project docs for container support. Nextcloud: yes.

Related comparisons