Harbor vs lazydocker

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted developer tools & git options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureHarborlazydocker
CategoryDeveloper Tools & GitDeveloper Tools & Git
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM4,096 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, helmbinary, source
GitHub stars★ 29,113★ 52,348
First released20162019
ReplacesDocker Hub, ArtifactoryDocker Desktop

Why pick each one

Choose Harbor if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 29.1k GitHub stars
Harbor details

Choose lazydocker if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 52.3k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
lazydocker details

Frequently asked questions

Is Harbor or lazydocker better?

lazydocker is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Harbor if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Harbor and lazydocker free and open-source?

Yes. Harbor is licensed under Apache-2.0 and lazydocker under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Harbor and lazydocker with Docker?

Harbor: yes. lazydocker: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons