Monika vs Peekaping
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Monika
Synthetic monitoring with HTTP probes from config
VS
Peekaping
Self-hosted uptime monitoring and status page service
| Feature | Monika | Peekaping |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 625 | ★ 1,169 |
| First released | 2021 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Pingdom, Datadog Synthetics | Pingdom, Better Uptime |
Why pick each one
Choose Monika if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Monika or Peekaping better?
Neither is universally better. Peekaping has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Monika and Peekaping free and open-source?
Yes. Monika is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Peekaping under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Monika and Peekaping with Docker?
Monika: yes. Peekaping: yes.