HACS vs Piper
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted home automation options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
HACS
Community store for custom Home Assistant integrations and themes
VS
Piper
Fast, local neural text-to-speech for voice assistants
| Feature | HACS | Piper |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Home Automation | Home Automation |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Python | C++ |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | source | docker, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 7,603 | ★ 5,066 |
| First released | 2019 | 2023 |
| Replaces | SmartThings community add-ons | Amazon Polly, Google TTS |
Why pick each one
Choose HACS if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 7.6k GitHub stars
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is HACS or Piper better?
HACS is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Piper if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are HACS and Piper free and open-source?
Yes. HACS is licensed under MIT and Piper under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run HACS and Piper with Docker?
HACS: check the project docs for container support. Piper: yes.