Guidance vs Petals
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Guidance
Constrained generation language for controlling LLMs
VS
Petals
Run large language models collaboratively in a swarm
| Feature | Guidance | Petals |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Self-Hosted AI | Local LLM Runners |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Jupyter Notebook | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 8,192 MB | 8,192 MB |
| Deployment | source | source, docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 21,706 | ★ 10,483 |
| First released | 2023 | 2022 |
| Replaces | OpenAI API | OpenAI API |
Why pick each one
Choose Guidance if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Mature project with 21.7k GitHub stars
- Written in Jupyter Notebook
Choose Petals if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 10.5k GitHub stars
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is Guidance or Petals better?
Guidance is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Petals if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Guidance and Petals free and open-source?
Yes. Guidance is licensed under MIT and Petals under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Guidance and Petals with Docker?
Guidance: check the project docs for container support. Petals: yes.