Group-Office vs ZenTao
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted groupware options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Group-Office
Web-based groupware and CRM with email and calendar
VS
ZenTao
Open-source project and team collaboration platform
| Feature | Group-Office | ZenTao |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Groupware | Groupware |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | PHP | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 275 | ★ 1,665 |
| First released | 2003 | 2009 |
| Replaces | Microsoft 365, Google Workspace | Jira, Confluence |
Why pick each one
Choose Group-Office if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in PHP
Frequently asked questions
Is Group-Office or ZenTao better?
Neither is universally better. ZenTao has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Group-Office and ZenTao free and open-source?
Yes. Group-Office is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and ZenTao under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Group-Office and ZenTao with Docker?
Group-Office: yes. ZenTao: yes.