DAViCal vs Tasks.org Server alt nono Calendarserver
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
DAViCal
Server for sharing calendars and address books via DAV
VS
Tasks.org Server alt nono Calendarserver
Standards-compliant calendar and scheduling server
| Feature | DAViCal | Tasks.org Server alt nono Calendarserver |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Groupware | Calendar & Contacts |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | PHP | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 200 | ★ 506 |
| First released | 2007 | 2007 |
| Replaces | Google Calendar, Microsoft Exchange | Google Calendar, Exchange |
Why pick each one
Choose DAViCal if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in PHP
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Choose Tasks.org Server alt nono Calendarserver if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Written in Python
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is DAViCal or Tasks.org Server alt nono Calendarserver better?
Neither is universally better. Tasks.org Server alt nono Calendarserver has the larger community, while DAViCal is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are DAViCal and Tasks.org Server alt nono Calendarserver free and open-source?
Yes. DAViCal is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Tasks.org Server alt nono Calendarserver under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run DAViCal and Tasks.org Server alt nono Calendarserver with Docker?
DAViCal: yes. Tasks.org Server alt nono Calendarserver: check the project docs for container support.