Davis vs khal
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Davis
Modern admin interface for sabre/dav CalDAV server
VS
khal
Command-line calendar built on CalDAV
| Feature | Davis | khal |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Groupware | Calendar & Contacts |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | PHP | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 727 | ★ 3,039 |
| First released | 2020 | 2013 |
| Replaces | Google Calendar, iCloud | Google Calendar |
Why pick each one
Choose khal if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Active community (3k GitHub stars)
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Davis or khal better?
Neither is universally better. khal has the larger community, while Davis is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Davis and khal free and open-source?
Yes. Davis is licensed under MIT and khal under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Davis and khal with Docker?
Davis: yes. khal: check the project docs for container support.