Citadel vs mailcow

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCitadelmailcow
CategoryGroupwareMail Servers
LicenseGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguageCJavaScript
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB6,144 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, sourcedocker
GitHub stars★ 100★ 13,245
First released19872016
ReplacesMicrosoft Exchange, Microsoft 365Microsoft Exchange, Google Workspace

Why pick each one

Choose Citadel if…

  • Single-package setup
  • Low resource needs
Citadel details

Choose mailcow if…

  • All components preconfigured
  • Active community
mailcow details

Frequently asked questions

Is Citadel or mailcow better?

Neither is universally better. mailcow has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Citadel and mailcow free and open-source?

Yes. Citadel is licensed under GPL-3.0 and mailcow under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Citadel and mailcow with Docker?

Citadel: check the project docs for container support. mailcow: yes.

Related comparisons