Gramps Web vs PostHog
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted web analytics options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
| Feature | Gramps Web | PostHog |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Web Analytics | Web Analytics |
| License | free | MIT |
| Language | JavaScript | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 4,096 MB |
| Deployment | docker, one-click | docker, kubernetes |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,586 | ★ 37,548 |
| First released | 2023 | 2020 |
| Replaces | — | Google Analytics, Mixpanel, Amplitude |
Why pick each one
Choose Gramps Web if…
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- One-click install on common self-host platforms
- Active community (1.6k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is Gramps Web or PostHog better?
Neither is universally better. PostHog has the larger community, while Gramps Web is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Gramps Web and PostHog free and open-source?
Yes. Gramps Web is licensed under free and PostHog under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Gramps Web and PostHog with Docker?
Gramps Web: yes. PostHog: yes.