Grafana OnCall vs Mailrise
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Grafana OnCall
Open-source on-call management and incident escalation
VS
Mailrise
SMTP gateway that forwards email alerts to push services
| Feature | Grafana OnCall | Mailrise |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Python | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, helm | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,889 | ★ 1,584 |
| First released | 2021 | 2021 |
| Replaces | PagerDuty, Opsgenie | PagerDuty |
Why pick each one
Choose Mailrise if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.6k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is Grafana OnCall or Mailrise better?
Neither is universally better. Grafana OnCall has the larger community, while Mailrise is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Grafana OnCall and Mailrise free and open-source?
Yes. Grafana OnCall is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Mailrise under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Grafana OnCall and Mailrise with Docker?
Grafana OnCall: yes. Mailrise: yes.