GPUStack vs New API
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
GPUStack
Manage GPU clusters for running AI models
VS
New API
Next-gen LLM gateway and AI asset management system
| Feature | GPUStack | New API |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Self-Hosted AI | Local LLM Runners |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Python | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 8,192 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, bare-metal | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,456 | ★ 44,636 |
| First released | 2024 | 2024 |
| Replaces | OpenAI API | OpenRouter, OpenAI API |
Why pick each one
Choose GPUStack if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 5.5k GitHub stars
Choose New API if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 44.6k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is GPUStack or New API better?
Neither is universally better. New API has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are GPUStack and New API free and open-source?
Yes. GPUStack is licensed under Apache-2.0 and New API under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run GPUStack and New API with Docker?
GPUStack: yes. New API: yes.