GoTTY vs Neko
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
GoTTY
Share your terminal as a web application
VS
Neko
Self-hosted virtual browser running in Docker
| Feature | GoTTY | Neko |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Remote Access & VPN | Remote Access & VPN |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | binary, docker | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 19,537 | ★ 21,884 |
| First released | 2015 | 2020 |
| Replaces | PuTTY | Browserling |
Why pick each one
Choose GoTTY if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 19.5k GitHub stars
Choose Neko if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 21.9k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is GoTTY or Neko better?
Neither is universally better. Neko has the larger community, while GoTTY is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are GoTTY and Neko free and open-source?
Yes. GoTTY is licensed under MIT and Neko under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run GoTTY and Neko with Docker?
GoTTY: yes. Neko: yes.