GoTTY vs Nebula
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
GoTTY
Share your terminal as a web application
VS
Nebula
Scalable overlay networking tool from Slack
| Feature | GoTTY | Nebula |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Remote Access & VPN | Remote Access & VPN |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | binary, docker | binary, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 19,537 | ★ 17,591 |
| First released | 2015 | 2019 |
| Replaces | PuTTY | Tailscale |
Why pick each one
Choose GoTTY if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 19.5k GitHub stars
Choose Nebula if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Mature project with 17.6k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is GoTTY or Nebula better?
GoTTY is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Nebula if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are GoTTY and Nebula free and open-source?
Yes. GoTTY is licensed under MIT and Nebula under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run GoTTY and Nebula with Docker?
GoTTY: yes. Nebula: check the project docs for container support.